Why does Schlosser argue that a counterclaim about the fast-food industry is flawed?

Why does Schlosser argue that a counterclaim about the fast-food industry is flawed?

• A. Fast-food workers refuse to unionize.
• B. The industry shows it does not care about workers.
• C. Many employers genuinely care about their workers.
• D. The industry controls individual franchisees too strictly.

Answer: (B)

Schlosser argues that the fast-food industry shows it does not care about workers by highlighting the systemic issues and practices within the industry that prioritize profit over the well-being of employees. For instance, he discusses the low wages, lack of benefits, and poor working conditions that many fast-food employees face. This lack of care is evident in how the industry often treats its workforce as expendable, focusing solely on efficiency and cost-cutting measures rather than investing in the welfare and development of its employees. Schlosser's analysis reveals a pattern where the needs and rights of workers are overlooked, reinforcing the idea that the industry's practices fundamentally disregard their welfare.

Schlosser argues that the fast-food industry shows it does not care about workers by highlighting the systemic issues and practices within the industry that prioritize profit over the well-being of employees. For instance, he discusses the low wages, lack of benefits, and poor working conditions that many fast-food employees face. This lack of care is evident in how the industry often treats its workforce as expendable, focusing solely on efficiency and cost-cutting measures rather than investing in the welfare and development of its employees. Schlosser's analysis reveals a pattern where the needs and rights of workers are overlooked, reinforcing the idea that the industry's practices fundamentally disregard their welfare.